AvoidJW Icon 512
JEHOVAH’S

WITNESSES

More than 10 years revealing secrets because there is no excuse for secrecy in religionw1997 June 1; Dan 2:47; Matt 10:26; Mark 4:22; Luke 12:2; Acts 4:19, 20.

Jehovah’s Witnesses sue the state for discrimination

Originally published in Dutch by NOS nieuws on December 10, 2023.

Jehovah's Witnesses are suing the Dutch State for discrimination. A spokesperson confirmed this after reporting in Trouw. The Witnesses believe it is unfair that only their dealings with sexual abuse have been investigated, while other religious groups are not taken into account.

The Jehovah's Witnesses refer to research conducted by Utrecht University in 2020. It showed that reports of abuse were not handled properly. Those who reported the sexual abuse only to parents or elders within the community gave an average grade of 3.3 to the handling of the incident.

The participants in the study blame the unsatisfactory approach on the closed culture of Jehovah's Witnesses. The elders are focused on keeping the community together and quickly strive for reconciliation between perpetrator and victim. In addition, the aftercare for the abuse victim remains underexposed. Nearly half of the abuse cases involved incest.

Independent research

The legal process of Jehovah's Witnesses is not well received by the Reclaimed Voices foundation. This foundation stands up for victims of sexual abuse within closed communities.

"This means that Jehovah's Witnesses do not want to take the results of the research seriously, says Raymond Hintjes, chairman of the foundation, in the NOS Radio 1 Journaal . "They are much more concerned with protecting their own reputation rather than with the stories of victims who indicate that they have been duped."

According to Hintjes, it is not surprising that the research by Utrecht University only focused on this religious group. "There was also reason for this. There had been a number of media reports about sexual abuse within the circles of Jehovah's Witnesses. Subsequently, there were discussions with the State, both by the Jehovah's Witnesses and representatives of our foundation."

Reclaimed Voices has indicated that the way the group deals with sexual abuse could be detrimental to victims, says Hintjes. "We then also said that people should not rely solely on our story, but that independent research should be conducted. And since it was about Jehovah's Witnesses, it seems obvious to me that you should investigate what was said about Jehovah's Witnesses. "

Legal battle

Hintjes calls the timing of the lawsuit remarkable. "About four years after the publication of the study, a lawsuit was filed with that argument, while the same argument also applied when the study was conducted. They ultimately participated in the study, but when it was to be published and the results did not like the research, they opposed publication. They then lost the summary proceedings initiated."

According to Hintjes, the religious community chooses to dismiss stories from victims of abuse as stories from disgruntled ex-members who are out to discredit Jehovah's Witnesses. "They could use the results to improve abuse policy, but instead they are fighting a legal battle. In doing so, they ignore the stories and the victims of abuse do not receive recognition."

The judge will make his ruling on Wednesday.

Reaction of Jehovah’s Witnesses

Spokesman Jeroen Verhoeff of Jehovah’s Witnesses said in a response to the NOS that the research by Utrecht University focused on the group “as a religion”, but that many of the accusations were not made against an “elder or other authority within the community.” “.

“96 percent of the allegations therefore had nothing to do with alleged institutional sexual abuse within the religion of Jehovah’s Witnesses,” it said. In addition, Verhoef doubts the accusations. He says that the Utrecht report admits that the allegations in the report have not been substantively investigated and that the investigation was not about finding the truth.”

The group says it regrets that some victims were dissatisfied with the way they were helped by elders. “Without specific details, it is difficult for us to assess whether such criticism is justified in a particular case. That said, we always strive to respond better to any allegation of abuse,” Verhoeff said.

The fact that the State focuses its investigation on Jehovah’s Witnesses is discriminatory, says Verhoeff. He argues that several other religions have not required investigations into willingness to report allegations of sexual abuse.

Picture of Lester Somrah
Lester Somrah

Lester Somrah writes about the beliefs and practices of Jehovah’s Witnesses on his social media platforms and was baptized as a member in 1998.

Read more from Lester