AvoidJW Icon 512
JEHOVAH’S

WITNESSES

More than 10 years revealing secrets because there is no excuse for secrecy in religionw1997 June 1; Dan 2:47; Matt 10:26; Mark 4:22; Luke 12:2; Acts 4:19, 20.

New 2025 Governing Body update says toasting and clinking glasses is now a personal decision

New Governing Body Update 2025 Toasting and clinking glasses

Published and Written by Miss Usato, July 4th 2025

Jehovah’s Witnesses are known for their distinct beliefs and practices that often set them apart from broader social customs. Among these are their views on toasting, clinking glasses, and cheering, especially during festive occasions like weddings, graduations, and formal dinners. A New Governing Body update changes their doctrines once again.

Governing Body Update #4: “We have concluded-“

2025 GB Stephen Lett, personal decision to toast and clink glasses
July 4th, 2025, Stephen Lett on Governing Body Update #4 regarding a new changed practice.

July 4th, 2025, Governing Body update #4 -Governing Body member Stephen Lett, on JW broadcasting, goes into the organization’s customs regarding traditions and symbols. He says that some of these traditions, once viewed as ties to paganism, are now just “friendly customs.” At the end of the video, he says, “The Governing Body has concluded that there is no need to make a rule regarding toasting and clinking glasses. Each Christian should use the principles that we have discussed in this update, and use their own bible- trained conscience to make a good decision. What does this mean? Are we saying that toasting is okay, at all times, and in every situation? Of course not. we are simply saying there is no need to make a rule.”

Organizations history regarding Toasting & Clinking Glasses

Jehovah’s Witnesses have consistently avoided the practice of toasting and clinking glasses, due to what they consider spiritually dangerous origins and implications. Historically, the Watchtower magazine has explained that such customs can be traced back to pagan rituals and superstitious practices. This belief is recorded as early as 1952. In 1968, the Watchtower linked toasting to libations offered to gods or the dead, as practiced in ancient Greek and Roman cultures. These acts were seen as religious in nature, symbolizing a form of offering or reverence that Christians are taught to avoid.

The Awake! magazine further expanded on this in its 1985 coverage, explaining that clinking glasses was rooted in folklore, often believed to ward off evil spirits or test for poison—ideas clearly incompatible with the Bible’s rejection of superstition (Deuteronomy 18:10–12). Over time, even if the modern intent behind such customs may seem harmless or merely social, Jehovah’s Witnesses have been urged to consider not just current usage, but the symbolic and spiritual origins of a practice.

The core concerns behind this position are threefold: first, that toasting may appear to invoke divine favor, such as in common phrases like “to your health,” which could be interpreted as seeking a blessing from an unseen power. Second, these acts can seem to glorify humans or institutions—something Witnesses are cautious to avoid, as all praise and honor are reserved for Jehovah God alone. Third, engaging in such customs could stumble other believers or weaken one’s spiritual integrity by adopting practices tied to the world’s traditions.

Awake 1952, JW on Toasting and clinking glasses
Awake, May 1952 Questions from readers
Awake 1952 About Toasting and clinking glasses
Awake, May 1952, Questions from Readers

Timeline of Teachings on Toasting / Clinking Glasses

YearPublication & ThemeHighlights
1952Watchtower, May 15 – Q‑and‑AFirst explicit mention: toasting is pagan, tied to drunkenness.
1968Watchtower, Jan 1 – Historical rootsQuotes Encyclopaedia Britannica on libations to gods/dead 
1985Awake!, Aug 1 – Clinking glass folkloreNotes clinking to repel devils or test for poison
1986Awake!, Mar 22 – Conscience guidanceSuggests mature Christians avoid it.
2007Watchtower, Feb 15 – Cultural updateReferences Intl Handbook on Alcohol & Culture; warns again
2025Governing Body statement (today)Its a personal decision to toast and clink your glass, because it may just be a friendly custom
PracticePositionKey ReasoningMain References
ToastingDiscouraged / AvoidedPagan origins, glorifies man, symbolic meaning remainsWT 1952, 1968, 2007
Clinking GlassesDiscouraged / AvoidedLinked to superstition, ritual symbolismAwake! 2001, WT 1982
Cheering (wild)DiscouragedUndignified, mimics worldly/nationalistic behaviorWT 1989, Pay Attention 2001
Cheering (modest)AcceptableWhen restrained and appropriate to the settingGeneral guidance
Applause (polite)AcceptableCommon at meetings, conventions, celebrationsObserved practice

Margaret, IL, USA- “We couldn’t toast or clink glasses at our wedding. While my husband and I were witnesses at the time, my unbelieving father got up and started toasting to us, without knowing the rules. He was quickly hushed by one of our congregation elders. I was embarrassed.”

John, Brazil- “It is a silly thing, but it was uncomfortable explaining to friends why I never cheered with them, why I never allowed a toast at my graduation party. Little things like that should make you question, would a God really discipline you for doing that? Is it hurting him to make a toast congratulating someone?”

This latest clarification on toasting and clinking glasses underscores a broader pattern that many have observed in recent years—namely, the way the Governing Body continues to “conclude” new positions that often reflect a subtle easing or reframing of long-standing rules. While the core reasoning still leans on avoiding pagan origins and preserving spiritual integrity, the tone has noticeably shifted from strict prohibition to a more nuanced, pastoral guidance. For some Jehovah’s Witnesses, this may feel like progress—acknowledging cultural context and conscience. For others, it raises deeper questions about the stability of doctrine and the authority behind such evolving conclusions. When a once rigid rule becomes a matter of “conscience” decades later, it invites reflection on how interpretations—once thought to be divinely unchangeable—can be revised by human leadership. In that light, this new update may be seen not just as a clarification, but as part of a growing trend in how the organization adapts its image and teachings to meet a modern audience, while still claiming continuity with its past. Beards, terms of disfellowshipping, women wearing pants…How many more “relaxed” changes will we see from the Governing Body?